My son's communication device has afforded us many moments we might otherwise have missed. "Alligator, frog, bug" means "I want to watch the Princess and the Frog." "Pig, porcupine, elephant" is how he lets me know he'd prefer to watch "Sing." Some movies require a more direct approach. He'll fall down and say, "Oh no!" if I pick the wrong one, but a fist bump followed by a fa-la-la-la-la means "Big Hero 6." Using this method, I can usually figure out what show he wishes to see.
This past week, let me say, my fifteen year old and I had a disagreement. We both took ourselves to our rooms to calm down. Paul took his communication device and punched in the words "Love Faith, love Mom, Paul Love, eat food, love Mom, Love Faith, Paul love." (It happened just before dinner).
I thought an older sibling imitating Paul, typed in the words, but the words worked for both of us. The next day, I met with Paul's teacher to visit a site for his schooling next year. She asked if we'd put any new words in his communication device. (I hadn't). She informed me he'd punched in, "Paul sister Bonnie come home today." Bonn wouldn't be home until Sunday but still, the sentence made me think, maybe he did write the other note too.
Still, much of Paul's ability to communicate is dependent upon the rest of us thinking about what he's thinking and more importantly, why. Last night, I took him to Faith's play. Her school put on "Once Upon A Mattress." After the show, Paul clapped enthusiastically, and stood up and clapped and yelled when the King took a bow. He even ran over to shake the King's hand.
The next day, I puzzled over why he found the character of the King so appealing and it was so obvious, I wondered how I ever didn't see it. The King in the play is mute until the end, and spends his time using sign and gestures which his musician and jester interpret. He identified with the King.
Now I wish I'd taken a picture of Paul with the King, but it does give me an insight into how he sees himself, and probably how he sees me...I'm guessing I'm the jester.
All of which leads to why it is that this family needs Paul, all of which leads to why I wanted to share all of this as a story. Bill Nye, science guy recently spoke with a panel about population control and the need to penalize families who have more than whatever it is that now is considered reasonable via policy. My son would be in that stack of the unreasonable number, and I object to the idea, much less the presumption entailed in that discussion, that some people are extra, that some people are unnecessary, and that some people should decide how many children other people should have. I object to using force of law to hurt those who don't agree with such "enlightened" policies.
We would never get to Paul in that world. We would never get to most of my children, and my life, and my family's life would be poorer for it. However, returning to only focusing on the one child we know will not be a world player as it were, Paul is the one society might come to think most easy to whittle out because of his condition.
Let me say, Paul has an extra chromosome. Paul himself, is not extra. He is not part of the surplus population, and he is not a drain on society, he is a breath of fresh air. He is a gift, designed to reveal to the rest of us, to remind the rest of us, about what is and is not important. He makes sure everyone comes to the table to eat. He always wants a bed time story and prayers, he always wants a bath and he always picks and gives me a flower if he sees them when we're walking to the bus. He dances with abandon, he enjoys slapstick and adventure movies and musicals, and greets his sisters and brothers as if he hasn't seen them since forever.
If there's extra beyond the genetic replica of a chromosome in a person with Down Syndrome, it's the gift of being able to love easily and love well. I would say to Bill Nye, and anyone else who views my son or anyone else with a permanent mental and physical disability as extra or unnecessary, the world has plenty of people who work, plenty of people who are very smart, but it needs every person it can find, willing to love easily and well.
Sometimes serious, sometimes funny, always trying to be warmth and light, focuses on parenting, and the unique struggles of raising a large Catholic family in the modern age. Updates on Sunday, Tuesday and Friday...and sometimes more!
Showing posts with label overpopulation. Show all posts
Showing posts with label overpopulation. Show all posts
Sunday, April 30, 2017
Tuesday, September 15, 2009
The Write Way to Disarm Bears
This week we saw a black bear in the wild while driving through Shenandoah National Park. It was a moment of wonder and something my husband had hoped to experience his whole life. For five minutes, we all stared at a beast from the safety of our car before it lumbered into the foliage. It was amazing how silently such a large creature could move and more stunning how quickly it could vanish from view.
The state I live in decided that up to 500 bears may be killed to curb overpopulation and prevent excessive encounters between bears and humans. This license to kill bruins only exists within Maryland, so the park where we saw our Smokey won't be affected. Given the amount of readily available food, including possibly awestruck tourists that stop to snap pictures on Skyline Drive, I'm betting that bear won't get too much wanderlust. If he's smart, he'll stay put such that anyone who takes a shot at him is committing a federal offense.
For the remaining wandering bears out there in Maryland, they still don't have too much to worry about if it's me. While any of the 350 million Americans could exercise their rights and try to bag one of these stray bears in the Free State, most of us should refrain. Shooting anything outside of a video game is much harder in real life. I remember shooting clay pigeons at a range with my Dad. It was the first and only time I've ever held/shot a gun. (I was 17). Given my score, I wouldn't trust me with a red rider or a water gun, much less an actual thing that could hurt someone.
For me, the pen shall always be mightier than the sword or whatever form of weaponry that requires hand/eye coordination one chooses. If it comes to self defense, I would probably be best served by a blunt instrument like a bat, but I wouldn't want to go toe to toe with a creature that has claws, teeth and at least 250 pounds on me if all I'm packing is a Louisville slugger.
Then again, remembering how I fare at the plate, perhaps I'll just eviscerate the bear in fiction. I'll write about the beast and it will wind up on the internet. Then, the piece will go viral. He'll be embarrassed permanently and thus unable to score with the lady bears in his vicinity. As a result, the bear population will be reduced without the need for unnecessary violence.
That'll learn him.
Now, I can concentrate on fixing the overpopulation of deer.
The state I live in decided that up to 500 bears may be killed to curb overpopulation and prevent excessive encounters between bears and humans. This license to kill bruins only exists within Maryland, so the park where we saw our Smokey won't be affected. Given the amount of readily available food, including possibly awestruck tourists that stop to snap pictures on Skyline Drive, I'm betting that bear won't get too much wanderlust. If he's smart, he'll stay put such that anyone who takes a shot at him is committing a federal offense.
For the remaining wandering bears out there in Maryland, they still don't have too much to worry about if it's me. While any of the 350 million Americans could exercise their rights and try to bag one of these stray bears in the Free State, most of us should refrain. Shooting anything outside of a video game is much harder in real life. I remember shooting clay pigeons at a range with my Dad. It was the first and only time I've ever held/shot a gun. (I was 17). Given my score, I wouldn't trust me with a red rider or a water gun, much less an actual thing that could hurt someone.
For me, the pen shall always be mightier than the sword or whatever form of weaponry that requires hand/eye coordination one chooses. If it comes to self defense, I would probably be best served by a blunt instrument like a bat, but I wouldn't want to go toe to toe with a creature that has claws, teeth and at least 250 pounds on me if all I'm packing is a Louisville slugger.
Then again, remembering how I fare at the plate, perhaps I'll just eviscerate the bear in fiction. I'll write about the beast and it will wind up on the internet. Then, the piece will go viral. He'll be embarrassed permanently and thus unable to score with the lady bears in his vicinity. As a result, the bear population will be reduced without the need for unnecessary violence.
That'll learn him.
Now, I can concentrate on fixing the overpopulation of deer.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Leaving a comment is a form of free tipping. But this lets me purchase diet coke and chocolate.
Proud Member

Click Here to Join